Two more Kashmiri Pandits, one of them a teenager, died three days later in police action. The agitation spilled over to Jammu region, where three Muslim girls were abducted. Muslims and their properties were attacked in the city. The prosecution decided against pursuing the case and it petered out.
But the arc of the controversy has strong contemporary resonances. Police records, books, newspaper reports and interviews with witnesses and journalists are the source of this chapter. Share your perspective on this article with a post on ScrollStack, and send it to your followers.
Contribute Now. Inter-religious marriages Before the Akhtar-Kanth marriage, two high-profile marriages involving Kashmiri Muslim men and Kashmiri Pandit women had merely set tongues wagging. Fanning the flames In the late sixties, the situation in the Valley was similar to present-day Kashmir, minus the militancy. Let the Pandits assert. Some of the articles on this site seem very genuine, but others like this are biased and no different from an India Today or a Times of India article!
Come on Ms Bamzai, you wrote a full article on the exodus not even once mentioning the complete apathy and even collusion of the then state apparatus in this exodus.
And yeah, mentioned testimonies of Mr Pandita and even bigots like Vivek Agnihotri but had no space for dissenting opinions like those expressed by Ms Nitasha Kaul, a Pandit in exile! Amicable solution is only possible through a dialogue between all Kashmiris, and only after the Pandit community understands how their suffering has been turned by their leaders into a weapon of garnering votes.
CAA was the first step towards a respectable life for Bengali Hindus, Removal of Article was the first step towards restoring rights of Kashmiri Hindus. It does what it promised. Anyways, it seems you are too much into liberal crap to understand the truth and want to offer excuses. Muslims of kashmir are epitome for shamelessness and the ones Barking against CAA are contributing to ungrateful.
Karma screws in a deserving way. Be prepared. As because Hindus are devided among themselves into different casts, every invaders took the advantage of this point by terrorising common people so as to convert to Islam or to be wiped out.
This has to have a typical characteristics of Hindus who are always indifferent about the happening around them. Where as Muslims are very sensitive about anything happening around them. Because of this fundamental differences between this two communities Hindus are at a loser side than muslims. In Kashmir indisputably. We actually have no control over peace and amity.
Muslims did this in Pakistan and Bangladesh. But Hindus are not allowed to talk about it. This newspaper never raises the question with Bangladeshi ministers why Hindus leave Bangladesh and the Muslims do not leave India. The blame for the collective amnesia lies squarely with our lefty ecosystem.
Consider the editor of The Print, Jyoti Malhotra. These people suffer from a pathological refusal to point a finger whenever the perpetrator of a crime is a Muslim — whether it is the religious cleaning in Kashmir or a terror attack elsewhere in India. They even started spreading canards that the Pandits left for no good reason based on a few stray incidents I am sure you would have seen some mediawallahs parroting this line on the tv in the recent weeks. The entire lefty media ecosystem deserves to be crushed mercilessly for their deliberate falsification of even the contemporary Indian history.
Corruption runs ugh in Congress Part. Th corrupt Congress did not want to help them since there. Friday, 12 November, Sign in. Forgot your password? Get help. Privacy Policy. Password recovery. Home Opinion Haider to Shi This article is a story of sordid mindset besetted with prejudged notions. The monetary disparities and oppression of the public in the hands of higher castes attracted them towards Islam which preached monotheism and equality.
People from lower castes were introduced to monotheism, and they were treated kindly by the Sufis, and as a result, they converted to Islam. Islam got patronage when rulers converted to Islam. Some of them adopted tolerant religious policies while others forced people to convert. Speak Up. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.
You must be logged in to comment. Rashi Razdan Brutal conversions and barbaric people are being glorified in this article. Kabul and Gandhar the Peshawar-Jalalabad region had been under his rule before they were lost to the Muslim conquest. This seems to have had an impression on him, and it is possible that he treated Hamim ibn Sama so well in an effort to establish good relations with the Umayyads. There are other references to interactions between mostly-Hindu Kashmiri people and their Muslim neighbors in Central Asia.
Also in the 9th century, a Persian Muslim traveler, Buzurg ibn Shahryar, recorded in his travelogue "The Wonders of India" that the Hindu King in Kashmir had ordered for the Quran to be translated into the Kashmiri language.
By the 12th century, we find mention of Muslims serving in the royal court and army of the Kashmiri Hindu king Harshadeva. Thus, the story of Muslims in Kashmir in this early period remains vague. On one hand, there is some evidence to suggest that Muslims were influential even in the Brahminical royal courts and that many lower-caste Hindus and Buddhists embraced Islam.
On the other hand, however, there is not much evidence of the steady growth of the Muslim community in Kashmir.
In fact, it is only in the lateth and earlyth centuries that we even find the first recorded Muslim preacher in Kashmir: a Sufi named Sayyid Sharf ad-Din Abd al-Rahman, but remembered as Hazrat Bulbul Shah. The name Bilal was later corrupted into Bulbul. As his title sayyid suggests, his family claimed direct descent from the Prophet PBUH and were known for their piety.
He studied in Baghdad and then traveled widely, first through Central Asia and then to Kashmir, where he arrived in , during the reign of the last Hindu king of Kashmir, Raja Suha Dev.
After a brief stay in Kashmir, he left, but returned almost 30 years later, this time possibly with some of his disciples. By the time he came back, it had completely collapsed, for the first time in history. He may have been seeking a better job; he served in the administration of Raja Suha Dev. But they were not the ones to jumpstart that process.
0コメント